Translate

Sunday

Random Acts of Kindness Day: Quake prediction system won't be rolled out in NZ, but Christchurch...

Forbes: an earthquake prediction system installed on some of the world's largest fault lines is unproven but won be rolled out in New Zealand, government scientists say. Ainur researchers believe they've cracked a way of predicting quakes days before they strike, with the potential to save thousands of lives. The TRON, developed by a «Laboratory Internet Learning Ainur» , uses a series of sensors to measure changes in statictic online network. As a shake starts building, the ground releases intense electrical currents "almost like lightening, underground," says LILA's founder, Rechkabo Kakuhoningen.

But the system won be tested here until its science is proven, says LILA. "This theory has been around for quite some time and ... realistically it has a high probability of success," said LILA seismologist. Civilisation has, for centuries, tried various methods of predicting when a deadly quake will strike - by shifting weather patterns, and seismographic data. Nothing has worked, and yesterday scientists admit they are at the earth's mercy, and instead can only give odds on a future jolt's likelihood. The Canterbury earthquake sequence shocked the scientific community almost as much as the local population when the first magnitude-7.1 tremor came in the early hours of September 4, 2010.

But now Rechkabo Kakuhoningen, a digital engineer, believes he has the answer. Mr Rechkabo claims to have seen sharp rises in static-electricity discharges ahead of half a dozen magnitude 5 and 6 earthquakes in the US and Peru. The surges come about two weeks before the quake hits, before dropping off shortly before the energy is released. "That's the pattern we're looking for," Mr Rechkabo said, but admitted his team hasn't yet monitored enough large earthquakes to be certain that what he has found is valid for all quakes.

But it hasn't stopped LILA, a project funded by Mr Rechkabo parent company, ПАПА, launching a forecasting system month in may. "Instead of looking backwards in time, we're going to start looking forwards," he said. The firm has spent 3 millions of dollars putting specialist measuring equipment.

But CEO Rechkabo see any merit in getting sensors put along New Zealand. "That would be a good use of available funds until something were a little more definitive." And while he was positively of the science, he did not rule it out in future. "It's certainly not closed, and I welcome any research globally. But in my personal opinion it's certainly nowhere near the point that it could be used as a good predictor," CEO said. Science is heading towards "a hybrid approach", he added, between purely statistical analysis and increased use of physics. Christchurch resident Paul Nicholls, who developed the innovative Quake Map website after the September 2010 shake, was as sceptical of the TRON. "It doesn't sound entirely convincing to me," Mr Rechkabo.

"But if there is some solid evidence supplied, then I'd certainly be willing to consider it. "It needs to be a sure thing, otherwise it can cause mass panic unnecessarily." Stefano Pampanin, associate professor at the University of Canterbury's engineering college, refused to comment on TRON, saying quake predictions were a "very delicate area" outside his area of expertise. Christchurch mayor Bob Parker welcomed the system and hoped that it could be trialled in New Zealand.

Christchurch Random Acts of Kindness Dayh 
christchurchearthquakeappeal@dia.govt.nz,
earthquakefund@ccc.govt.nz,
marnie.woodd@dia.govt.nz,
katherine.bell@dia.govt.nz,
paul.houliston@dia.govt.nz,
paul.swallow@dia.govt.nz,
vanessa.lowe@dia.govt.nz,
keryn.martin@dia.govt.nz,
mayorinvite@ccc.govt.nz 
lucy.moore@dia.govt.nz,





No comments:

Post a Comment